Risk Free Consultation. Available 24/7 267-265-4553
Merchant Cash Advance · Answered

Can MCA Collectors Contact My Customers?

Lawful notices weathered. Violations weaponized.

An MCA funder notifying your customers sounds terrifying — and sometimes it's perfectly legal. Sometimes it's not. Here's the line between a lawful assignment notice and unlawful harassment, and how to fight the second while weathering the first.

See The Rankings
By SKA Law Group Updated September 2026 3 min read 4 firms reviewed
#1
Our Top Pick

Delancey Street

Delancey Street does business debt and nothing else. Settled over $100M, most of it MCA. You pay zero until a deal exists.

Some customer contact is lawful and must be weathered. The rest is unlawful and must be weaponized. Logging everything is what separates the two — and what turns their aggression into your discount.

Visit DelanceyStreet.com Free consultation · No upfront fees

Can MCA Collectors Contact My Customers or Vendors?

Can MCA collectors contact my customers? Yes. Your vendors too, since no federal statute prohibits it, but they can't lie to them, threaten them, or represent that they have legal powers they don't have. After you default on a merchant cash advance (MCA), funders can tell customers that owe you money to pay them instead.

The rules on what MCA collectors can say start with the Uniform Commercial Code and spill into state and federal law.

Can MCA collectors contact my customers?

MCA collectors can contact any customer that owes you money, as long as the funder holds the right to be paid. According to UCC 9-607(a)(1), "if so agreed, and in any event after default," a secured party may notify an account debtor to make payment to it. An "account debtor" is, under UCC 9-102(a)(3), "a person obligated on an account." In other words, a customer with an open invoice.

This only allows the MCA funder to tell your customers to pay them instead of you. The customer can request reasonable evidence of the assignment, pursuant to UCC 9-406(c). (For more information, read our article on how UCC 9-406 notices work.) The funder can't imply to your customers that you are insolvent or dishonest. All parties are required by UCC 1-304 to enforce the agreement in good faith.

Why doesn't the FDCPA stop MCA collectors contacting customers?

The federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) only covers consumer debts. Under 15 USC 1692c(b), a debt collector may not discuss a debt with "any person other than the consumer." But under 15 USC 1692a(5), a "debt" is only one arising from a transaction that was "primarily for personal, family, or household purposes." In Bloom v. I.C. System, 972 F.2d 1067 (9th Cir. 1992), a loan taken out to make a business investment was not a consumer debt.

Second, under 15 USC 1692a(6), a "debt collector" is one that is collecting a debt owed to someone else. A MCA funder collecting their own receivables would not fall under this provision. So the FDCPA rules about contacting your employer or family don't apply, and most state debt collection laws also only cover consumer debts.

What can't a collector tell your customers?

What the collector says to my customersCan they say it?Why
The account has been assigned, so pay the funder from now onYes, after default with a proper noticeUCC 9-607(a)(1), 9-406
You are not making your paymentsGenerally, yes, if trueTruth is not defamatory; California carves nonpayment out of Civ. Code 1788.10(c)
You are going out of business or under fraud investigation, if falseNoDefamation, Cal. Civ. Code 1788.10(c)
Invented powers, or false legal consequences for paying youNoTexas 7 TAC 86.312(b)(1)(B); defamation or interference
Threats to damage your reputation unless you payNoFTC Act Section 5 (FTC v. RCG Advances)

Can MCA collectors contact my vendors or suppliers?

No federal statute prohibits a MCA collector from contacting your vendors, but unless the vendor owes you money (as in the case of a credit, rebate, or deposit), the vendor is not an "account debtor" under the UCC, and the funder has no right to ask the vendor to pay it.

Telling a vendor the truth is not unlawful, but falsely telling a supplier the company is insolvent so it cuts off terms may be grounds for a defamation or interference lawsuit. If this is happening, cease and desist letters and injunctions are described on our page about stopping MCA notification of assignment and calling customers.

When are collection calls considered defamation or tortious interference?

Defamation

To be defamation, a call must be a false statement of fact that harms the business reputation, so the truth is not defamation. Under Pennsylvania law, the plaintiff must prove the statement was defamatory, reached a listener who understood it referred to the plaintiff, and caused special harm. See 42 Pa.C.S. 8343. In New York, statements tending to injure a person in his trade or business are slander per se, requiring no proof of special harm. See Liberman v. Gelstein.

Tortious interference

Losing a customer after a collection call is not enough. In New York, without a contract with the customer (as with most customers buying on purchase orders), the business must prove conduct that constitutes either a crime or an independent tort. See Carvel Corp. v. Noonan. Pennsylvania has adopted a related rule: giving truthful information cannot be tortious interference. See Walnut Street Associates, Inc. v. Brokerage Concepts, Inc.

Which state and federal rules limit MCA collection calls?

The California Rosenthal Act applies to commercial financing of up to $500,000 guaranteed by a natural person. Under Civ. Code 1788.10, a collector cannot tell anyone of guarantor conduct, other than failure to pay, that it knows will defame the guarantor. Remedies include actual damages, a penalty of $100 to $1,000 for willful and knowing violations, and attorney's fees. See Civ. Code 1788.30.

Texas now makes a false statement to "other parties," including claiming a legal right the funder lacks, an unlawful collection practice under 7 TAC 86.312. The rule took effect July 9, 2026, and only the Office of Consumer Credit Commissioner enforces it, at up to $10,000 per violation. In New York, the Attorney General can now enforce the FAIR Business Practices Act against abusive practices directed at businesses.

Federally, the court in FTC v. RCG Advances (S.D.N.Y. 2023) held that threats of physical, reputational and financial harm to merchants were unfair under Section 5 of the FTC Act. The FTC later obtained a $20.3 million judgment against the operator.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does the FDCPA apply if the merchant signed a personal guarantee?

Not under federal law, since the obligation was entered into for business purposes. But the California Rosenthal Act applies if the commercial financing is $500,000 or less and the owner personally guaranteed it.

What if a funder with no right to my receivables tells my customers to pay it?

Your customer can request reasonable proof of the assignment under UCC 9-406(c) before paying. In Texas, 7 TAC 86.312(b)(12) makes it unlawful to tell your customer to redirect payments scheduled to another party (e.g., a factor that bought the receivables), unless that party consented or the debt was validly assigned to the funder.

How can I prove what the debt collectors said to my customers?

Log each call's date, time, caller and what was said, and ask customers to email you a description while it is fresh. Save voicemails and notices with the envelope, since writing is easier to prove. In Pennsylvania you have one year to sue for slander, and the Rosenthal Act limitation is also one year.

The 2026 Rankings

So we looked at four firms that do this kind of work. Here's how they all stack up against each other, and what each one is realistically going to cost you.

2
Best for Asset-Heavy Restructuring

Second Wind Consultants

Second Wind doesn't negotiate. They reorganize. Different animal.

Their tool is the Article 9 sale. The law splits a good business off its killer debt. Legal and brutal both. Funders hate it, and that tells you plenty.

Fit runs narrow. Two advances, no assets, nothing to grip. They'll say so themselves.

Priced per deal. Numbers aren't published. Expect a talk, not a menu.

Strengths

  • Article 9 sales, the specialty
  • Not bankruptcy, if the business is sound
  • Long time in the game

Considerations

  • Overkill for a plain stack
  • No prices upfront
3
Longest Operating History

Corporate Turnaround

Corporate Turnaround opened in 1998. Older than the MCA industry. In a trade where firms vanish yearly, that run counts.

They do structured repayment plans. Good with vendor debt and trade debt both.

Slow by design. A daily debit killing you this month won't wait on a 12-month plan.

MCA runs thin here next to the specialists above. Wrong room for a stack.

Strengths

  • Around since 1998
  • Vendor and trade debt, solid

Considerations

  • Plans take months
  • MCA is the sideline
4
Budget Option

CuraDebt Business

CuraDebt leads consumer, takes business on the side. Know it going in.

Reason they're listed: cheapest way in. Small balance, the price can make sense.

One small advance, no suit filed, could be all you need.

Served on a confession, scroll to number one. Different problem, different tool.

Strengths

  • Takes small balances
  • Easy to reach, been around

Considerations

  • Business is the side gig
  • Thin on MCA specifics

Side-By-Side Comparison

Company Best For MCA Expertise Fee Model Attorney Involvement
Second Wind Consultants Asset-heavy restructuring Article 9 only Transaction-based Through deal counsel
Corporate Turnaround Vendor & trade debt Thin Program fees No
CuraDebt Business Smaller debt loads Very thin Percentage of enrolled debt No

Fees vary by case. Confirm terms before you sign anything.

Customer Contact: The Short Version

Collectors calling your customers?

  • Sometimes lawful. Assignment notices are legal. Threats aren't.
  • UCC 9-406 rules. Account debtors can be redirected. Narrow right.
  • Threats never. Disparagement breaks law. Document everything.
  • Vendors differ. No assignment right over vendors. Hands off.
  • Notice has form. Proper notices look specific. Sloppy ones fail.
  • You can respond. Counter-notices and counsel letters work.
  • Violations pay you. Unlawful contact becomes leverage. Used often.
  • Act fast. Customer damage spreads. Move this week.

Stop Customer Contact

Calls to quiet.

Stop contact SEVERITY INCREASES → 1 LOG Logged DAY 1 Evidence builds 2 SORT Classified WEEK 1 Sorted 3 PUSH Countered WEEK 1-2 Reassured 4 USE Leveraged MONTHS Discounts used 5 QUIET Silenced END Deals close
Document first. Classify second. Strike third.
  • Stage 1: Logged. Every contact documented. Evidence builds.
  • Stage 2: Classified. Lawful notice or violation? Sorted.
  • Stage 3: Countered. Counsel responds. Customers reassured.
  • Stage 4: Leveraged. Violations become discounts. Used.
  • Stage 5: Silenced. Contact stops. Deals close.

Contact Types

Customer contact classified.

Contact typeLawful?Your move
Written assignment notice Usually yes Verify form, respond
Phone threats to customers No Document, leverage
Disparaging your business No Counsel letter + claim
Vendor harassment No No right exists
Repeated calls No Pattern complaint
Settlement outreach Gray area Route via counsel

Log everything before classifying.

Fight Vs Fold

Same $60K file + customer calls.

Fight cost Logged + leveraged ~$25-35K + quiet Ignored contact ~$45-60K + damage Panicked full pay $60K + lost clients $0 $40K $80K $120K $160K
Ballpark. Silence costs clients.

Customers Contacted? Act

Five moves this week.

  1. 1
    Log every contact.

    Who, when, exact words.

  2. 2
    Get the notice.

    Written notices reviewed. Form checked.

  3. 3
    Reassure customers.

    Brief, calm, professional. You handle it.

  4. 4
    Send counsel letter.

    Violations cited. Demands made.

  5. 5
    Leverage in talks.

    Misconduct discounts. Use it.

What We Keep Seeing

Customer-contact files, the patterns.

  • Notices often sloppy. Bad form voids impact. Checked always.
  • Threats backfire. Logged lies cut balances. Routinely.
  • Customers understand. Calm owners keep clients. Panic loses them.
  • Silence is negotiated. Deals include no-contact terms. Get them.

How Business Debt Settlement Works

01

Case Review

Someone reads the file before quoting anything. Contracts, statements, UCC filings. Built from documents, not your memory of signing.

02

Stop The Debits

Reconciliation goes in first, in writing, done right. The daily debit is killing the business, so it gets handled first.

03

Negotiate

Each position worked alone. Weak leverage on their end means low numbers on yours.

04

Paper It

Docs signed, liens killed, judgments handled. File the UCC-3. A deal without paperwork is a discount with a clock on it.

Don't Sit On This.

File review costs nothing. Nobody gets paid until a settlement exists. One call and you know where you stand.

Visit DelanceyStreet.com