Risk Free Consultation. Available 24/7 267-265-4553
Merchant Cash Advance · Answered

Why Did My Funder Contact My Credit Card Processor?

Find the motive, dispute the divert, restore the flow.

Funders call processors to verify your sales, trigger side agreements, or split your card revenue at the source. Each motive has a counter. Here's how to restore your deposits.

See The Rankings
By SKA Law Group Updated September 2026 3 min read 4 firms reviewed
#1
Our Top Pick

Delancey Street

Delancey Street does business debt and nothing else. Settled over $100M, most of it MCA. You pay zero until a deal exists.

Processors are intermediaries, not judges. They divert first and ask questions never, until counsel sends a dispute that makes continued diversion their liability. Paper restores flow.

Visit DelanceyStreet.com Free consultation · No upfront fees

Why Did My Funder Contact My Credit Card Processor?

Why would a merchant cash advance (“MCA”) funder contact your credit card processor? There are three reasons:

  1. to set up or confirm a “split” of a set percentage of your credit card sales;
  2. to redirect your credit card settlements after the funder claims you defaulted; or
  3. to collect on a judgment they obtained against you.

Processors are a target because credit card receivables are treated under Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC”) as “accounts.” See UCC § 9-102(a)(2) (an account includes a right to payment “arising out of the use of a credit or charge card”). See UCC § 9-109(a)(3) (providing that Article 9 applies to “a sale of accounts”).

How Does “Split Funding” Work as Compared to ACH Debits?

Some MCA deals are structured as split funding, which means your payment processor holds back a portion of your card sales and sends it to your funding source. Rather than withdrawing a set amount from your bank account daily as with an ACH agreement, funders take their funding “directly from the processor that clears and settles the credit card payment.” According to Nav, the holdback is “usually between 10% and 20% of your daily receipts.”

If your deal is structured this way, the MCA funder may contact your processor on day one to set up the split. Contracts often lock this in. For example, one of Arin Funding’s MCA contracts filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) requires the recipient to “use one (and only one) credit card processor, which shall be preapproved by the Purchaser.” Because split funding is a percentage of sales, it shrinks on bad days, whereas ACH deals rely on a “reconciliation clause.”

Since September 1, 2025, MCA funders on Texas deals under $1,000,000 may not automatically debit a recipient’s deposit account unless the MCA funder has taken a first priority, perfected security interest in the account. See Tex. Fin. Code § 398.056. The Texas law does not mention credit card processor splits, so it may push Texas funders toward them. Vermont is following the same model. See H.648 (Vt. 2026) (effective July 1, 2027).

Can MCA Funders Contact Your Credit Card Processor to Redirect Your Credit Card Sales?

MCA funders can notify your credit card processor to start paying them if the contract allows it or if you have defaulted on the MCA deal. See UCC § 9-607(a)(1) (a secured party may notify a person obligated on collateral to pay it “if so agreed, and in any event after default”). Many MCA contracts include this right. For example, Arin Funding’s April 2025 contract, provides that, upon an event of default, ARIN may “notify each Merchant’s credit card and/or check processor and account debtor(s) of the sale of Receivables hereunder.” Id. It also grants ARIN an “irrevocable power-of-attorney” to direct even a “new or additional” processor to pay ARIN. Id.

Here’s how this works if you average $4,000 in daily credit card sales and pay 15% to the funder.

SituationMCA Funder GetsYour Credit Card Sales Settle to You
15% of your credit card sales$600$3,400
Funder notifies processor to send all receivables to them$4,000$0
Processor holds funds due to dispute$0$0

Your processor is right to question whether the MCA funder is entitled to all of your receivables if it only purchased a percentage of them. The notice to the credit card processor should not be effective “if it does not reasonably identify the rights assigned.” UCC § 9-406(b)(1). For notices to customers, see our guide on whether MCA funders can contact your customers.

Why did your processor freeze payouts when the funder hasn't sued you?

It’s likely your processor is protecting itself pursuant to its agreement with you. Square’s payment terms expressly permit it to “defer payout or restrict access to your Proceeds, temporarily or indefinitely,” to, among other things, “resolve any pending dispute,” and its reserve can cover obligations to creditors “including levies, liens, or garnishments.” Likewise, Stripe’s agreement defines a reserve as funds the company “holds and controls” against your potential liabilities.

After judgment, New York law permits a judgment creditor to enforce its judgment against “any person who it is shown is or will become indebted to the judgment debtor.” See CPLR 5227. And one firm working on the funder side has published that it uses information subpoenas “directed at fintech platforms and payment processors.” A levy or restraint is legal process, which you answer in court or through negotiation with the funder.

What should you do this week if your processor is holding funds?

  1. Ask your processor for a copy of the notice it received from the funder;
  2. Find the clause in your MCA that the funder is enforcing and the default section;
  3. Remind your processor that it can rely on UCC 9-406(c), which lets it demand “reasonable proof that the assignment has been made” and keep paying you until the funder complies;
  4. Check whether the notice is only supposed to cover the percentage you sold;
  5. If the MCA has a reconciliation clause, ask for one in writing; and
  6. Document payroll and vendor payments you can’t make.

If the funder is collecting from account debtors with recourse, it must act “in a commercially reasonable manner.” See UCC 9-607(c). You may also consider cease and desist letters or an injunction to stop the notice of assignment. See How to Make Your Merchant Cash Advance Funder Stop Calling Your Customers!

Frequently Asked Questions

Does my processor have to follow the funder’s notice?

Your processor can rely on UCC 9-406(c) until the funder complies with it (it may keep paying you until the funder furnishes “reasonable proof that the assignment has been made”) and also 9-406(b)(1) if the notice doesn’t “reasonably identify the rights assigned.”

Can’t I just switch processors?

Likely not. Many MCA agreements include a provision prohibiting you from changing processors or adding new terminals without the funder’s written consent (see, e.g., April 2025 ARIN Agreement). Some may even deem it an event of default and accelerate the balance. See, e.g., October 2024 Arin Agreement. Review your agreement to see whether it would be.

Is a processor hold the same as the funder freezing my account?

The funder can’t freeze your account just by sending a letter to your processor; it’s likely your processor acting pursuant to its own agreement with you. Your bank account can generally only be frozen with legal process.

If I settle with the funder, won’t it withdraw the notice with the processor?

Not unless you make it a term of the settlement. Include a term requiring the funder to withdraw its notice with the processor in writing by a certain date. The processor has no reason to release your funds until the funder tells it to.

The 2026 Rankings

So we looked at four firms that do this kind of work. Here's how they all stack up against each other, and what each one is realistically going to cost you.

2
Best for Asset-Heavy Restructuring

Second Wind Consultants

Second Wind doesn't negotiate. They reorganize. Different animal.

Their tool is the Article 9 sale. The law splits a good business off its killer debt. Legal and brutal both. Funders hate it, and that tells you plenty.

Fit runs narrow. Two advances, no assets, nothing to grip. They'll say so themselves.

Priced per deal. Numbers aren't published. Expect a talk, not a menu.

Strengths

  • Article 9 sales, the specialty
  • Not bankruptcy, if the business is sound
  • Long time in the game

Considerations

  • Overkill for a plain stack
  • No prices upfront
3
Longest Operating History

Corporate Turnaround

Corporate Turnaround opened in 1998. Older than the MCA industry. In a trade where firms vanish yearly, that run counts.

They do structured repayment plans. Good with vendor debt and trade debt both.

Slow by design. A daily debit killing you this month won't wait on a 12-month plan.

MCA runs thin here next to the specialists above. Wrong room for a stack.

Strengths

  • Around since 1998
  • Vendor and trade debt, solid

Considerations

  • Plans take months
  • MCA is the sideline
4
Budget Option

CuraDebt Business

CuraDebt leads consumer, takes business on the side. Know it going in.

Reason they're listed: cheapest way in. Small balance, the price can make sense.

One small advance, no suit filed, could be all you need.

Served on a confession, scroll to number one. Different problem, different tool.

Strengths

  • Takes small balances
  • Easy to reach, been around

Considerations

  • Business is the side gig
  • Thin on MCA specifics

Side-By-Side Comparison

Company Best For MCA Expertise Fee Model Attorney Involvement
Second Wind Consultants Asset-heavy restructuring Article 9 only Transaction-based Through deal counsel
Corporate Turnaround Vendor & trade debt Thin Program fees No
CuraDebt Business Smaller debt loads Very thin Percentage of enrolled debt No

Fees vary by case. Confirm terms before you sign anything.

Processor Contact: The Short Version

Processor called, revenue diverted, here's why.

  • Three motives. Verify, enforce, divert. Find which.
  • Processor deals exist. Side agreements signed. Review clauses.
  • Splits divert revenue. Percentage held back. Starves cash.
  • Processors overcomply. Fear of liability. Push back.
  • Disputes restore flow. Counsel letters work. Fast.
  • Switching helps. New processor, clean rails. Legal.
  • Logs build claims. Diverted sums tracked. Recovered.
  • Settle the root. Processor fights end. Deals end them.

The Processor Pushback

Contact to restored flow.

Processor timeline SEVERITY INCREASES → 1 WHY Learned DAY 1 Named 2 FIGHT Disputed DAYS Sent 3 CASH Restored WEEKS Flowing 4 NEW Moved WEEKS Live 5 DONE Settled END Over
Days of dispute. Normal flow restored.
  • Stage 1: Learned. Motive found. Agreement pulled.
  • Stage 2: Disputed. Processor notified. Contest filed.
  • Stage 3: Restored. Deposits resumed. Splits paused.
  • Stage 4: Moved. New rails opened. Backup live.
  • Stage 5: Settled. Root deal closed. Contacts end.

Processor Motives

Three motives decoded.

MotiveWhat happensYour counter
Revenue verification Sales data requested Provide selectively via counsel
Agreement enforcement Side deal triggered Audit the agreement's validity
Split diversion Percent held back Dispute split in writing
Reserve hold Funds frozen at processor Demand release basis
Account closure Processing terminated Switch processors fast
Ongoing monitoring Reports demanded Limit scope, settle root

Processors respond to paper. Send it.

Dispute Vs Divert

$50K monthly card volume.

Processor cost Disputed + restored ~$5-12K fees Split for months ~$30-60K held Processing killed Revenue collapse $0 $40K $80K $120K $160K
Ballpark. Diverted revenue starves fastest.

Contacted? Push Back

Five moves this week.

  1. 1
    Learn the motive.

    Processor asked. Agreement pulled.

  2. 2
    Dispute in writing.

    Counsel to processor. Today.

  3. 3
    Demand accounting.

    Held sums listed. Dated.

  4. 4
    Open backup.

    Second processor. Ready.

  5. 5
    Settle root cause.

    Underlying deal closed. Ends all.

What We Keep Seeing

Processor files, the patterns.

  • Splits precede suits. Diversion first. Filings later.
  • Disputes restore. Processor letters work. Fast.
  • Backups save. Second rails run. Always.
  • Deals end contacts. Settlements silence. Permanently.

How Business Debt Settlement Works

01

Case Review

Someone reads the file before quoting anything. Contracts, statements, UCC filings. Built from documents, not your memory of signing.

02

Stop The Debits

Reconciliation goes in first, in writing, done right. The daily debit is killing the business, so it gets handled first.

03

Negotiate

Each position worked alone. Weak leverage on their end means low numbers on yours.

04

Paper It

Docs signed, liens killed, judgments handled. File the UCC-3. A deal without paperwork is a discount with a clock on it.

Don't Sit On This.

File review costs nothing. Nobody gets paid until a settlement exists. One call and you know where you stand.

Visit DelanceyStreet.com